
5 things about remote work employers don't know
Remote work is no longer a pandemic experiment. More companies are running hybrid or fully remote setups every quarter, and the legal frameworks around them have been quietly catching up β usually faster than employer playbooks have.
Most managers have a rough idea of how remote work should work. The problem is the details: who pays for what, when a written agreement is required, and what an employer can and can't do once an employee's "office" is their kitchen table. Here are five things that often get missed.
1. "Remote work" and "telework" aren't the same thing
When people say remote work, the mental picture is usually someone on a laptop on the sofa. In practice, most labour codes split this into two flavours:
- Work from a fixed remote location β the employee regularly performs their job from a specific address outside the employer's premises (typically their home).
- Telework / mobile work β the employee uses information and communication technology to work from anywhere, with no fixed location agreed in advance (yes, including the cafΓ© on the beach).
The distinction matters because it changes the rules around expense reimbursement, equipment, and how (and where) the employer can monitor work. If your contract doesn't name a specific location, most jurisdictions default to treating the arrangement as telework.
π‘ Quick check: read the contract. If it says "work location: employer's premises" but the person hasn't been in the office for six months, the paperwork doesn't match reality.
2. Regular remote work needs a written agreement
A casual "I'll work from home next week, easier for me" is fine for one-offs. Once remote work becomes routine β typically more than a handful of days per month, or any predictable pattern (every Friday, two days a week) β most labour frameworks require it to be set out in writing, either in the original employment contract or via an addendum.
The written agreement should cover, at minimum:
- the work location (a specific address, or the right to choose)
- equipment and tools (who provides them, who maintains them)
- expense reimbursement (amount and method)
- communication and supervision (how the work is monitored and how the employee stays reachable)
If none of this is documented, the employer has no clean record of the arrangement β which becomes a problem the moment there's a dispute, an accident, or a labour inspection.
π‘ Quick check: an email thread is not a contract. If your remote-work policy lives in Slack, it doesn't exist on paper.
3. Occasional remote work can stay informal β but only up to a point
Not every job can be done remotely, and even where it's possible, individual situations vary. Most labour rules treat occasional remote work β a doctor's appointment, waiting for a delivery, a sick child at home β as something employers can authorise informally without changing the contract.
The line is usually one of two things:
- Volume β once remote days exceed a threshold per month (commonly around 7), the arrangement is treated as routine.
- Pattern β even at lower volumes, a predictable cadence (every Friday, every other week) signals that the role has effectively become hybrid.
Once you cross either line, you're back to the previous point: it needs paperwork.
4. Someone has to pay for utilities and equipment
When an employee works from home, they're using their own electricity, internet, heating, and physical space to do the employer's work. That isn't free, and most jurisdictions now require employers to either reimburse a reasonable share of those costs or provide the equipment outright.
The two common approaches:
- Flat allowance β a fixed monthly amount covering home-office costs. Many tax authorities allow a capped daily or monthly rate to be paid tax-free, which is the simplest setup for both sides.
- Actual costs β reimbursement based on receipts or documented usage. More accurate, more administrative work.
Whichever model you pick, write it into the agreement. "We'll figure it out later" is a recipe for a payroll dispute.
5. The employer can β sometimes β enter the employee's home
This sounds dramatic, and it's the one most managers get wrong. In most labour frameworks, the employer retains a duty of care for occupational health and safety even when the workplace is the employee's home. To meet that duty, the employer can request access to the home workspace β but only for a defined purpose (verifying ergonomic conditions, servicing equipment, investigating an accident), only at a time agreed with the employee, and only when this right is set out in the contract.
The employer can't show up unannounced. They can't repurpose a safety check into a productivity inspection. And they can't compel access if it wasn't agreed in writing in advance. Done correctly, this is a planned visit with a clear scope β not a surprise.
The bottom line
Remote work isn't an exception to employment law β it's just employment law happening somewhere other than the office. The obligations around contracts, expenses, equipment, and workplace safety don't disappear; they shift. The employers who get it right treat remote arrangements with the same paperwork discipline as any other employment term: written, specific, and reviewed when the arrangement changes.
If you want to keep remote-work agreements, hours, and HR records in one place β without chasing PDFs around inboxes β Kloki handles that side digitally so you can focus on the work itself.



